🎙️ Navigating the Pay Transparency Patchwork: What Employers Need to Know for 2026
Jackson Lewis examines pay transparency laws expanding across states with inconsistent requirement and more regulations and enforcement coming in 2026
Pay Transparency Requirements: Key Takeaways
This Jackson Lewis podcast discusses the evolving pay transparency landscape as employers head into 2026.
Current State:
- Pay transparency laws create an inconsistent, complex patchwork across states
- Requirements vary widely: some mandate full salary ranges, others only starting pay; some require detailed benefits disclosures, others minimal information
- Recent example: Washington requires full pay ranges while California amended its law to require only starting pay ranges
What's Coming in 2026:
- More states and cities expected to adopt pay transparency laws (New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts recently joined)
- Existing states will issue more detailed guidance
- Pay data reporting requirements emerging (e.g., NYC considering annual reports by race/gender)
- Increased enforcement from states like Washington and Colorado
Key Challenges:
- Execution and compliance across multiple jurisdictions, not conceptual understanding
- Short cure periods (2-5 days in some states)
- Tracking remote workforce locations
- Coordinating across legal, HR, compensation, and recruiting teams
Recommendations:
- Define your organizational culture around transparency - decide whether to disclose only what's required, exceed requirements for simplicity, or maximize transparency everywhere
- Build scalable infrastructure and centralize data systems rather than relying on manual processes
- Take proactive steps now - don't wait for enforcement
- Enable cross-functional collaboration among teams
The overarching message: pay transparency isn't going away and will only expand.